fixes #1382
This commit is contained in:
@@ -2,9 +2,12 @@ FactoryGirl.define do
|
||||
factory :tag_alias do
|
||||
antecedent_name "aaa"
|
||||
consequent_name "bbb"
|
||||
status "active"
|
||||
|
||||
after(:create) do |tag_alias|
|
||||
tag_alias.process!
|
||||
unless tag_alias.status == "pending"
|
||||
tag_alias.process!
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,9 +2,12 @@ FactoryGirl.define do
|
||||
factory :tag_implication do
|
||||
antecedent_name "aaa"
|
||||
consequent_name "bbb"
|
||||
status "active"
|
||||
|
||||
after(:create) do |tag_implication|
|
||||
tag_implication.process!
|
||||
unless tag_implication.status == "pending"
|
||||
tag_implication.process!
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -53,15 +53,29 @@ class TagAliasTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
should "not validate for transitive relations" do
|
||||
ta1 = FactoryGirl.create(:tag_alias, :antecedent_name => "aaa", :consequent_name => "bbb")
|
||||
ta1 = FactoryGirl.create(:tag_alias, :antecedent_name => "bbb", :consequent_name => "ccc")
|
||||
assert_difference("TagAlias.count", 0) do
|
||||
ta3 = FactoryGirl.build(:tag_alias, :antecedent_name => "bbb", :consequent_name => "ddd")
|
||||
ta3.save
|
||||
assert(ta3.errors.any?, "Tag alias should be invalid")
|
||||
assert_equal("Tag alias can not create a transitive relation with another tag alias", ta3.errors.full_messages.join)
|
||||
ta2 = FactoryGirl.build(:tag_alias, :antecedent_name => "aaa", :consequent_name => "bbb")
|
||||
ta2.save
|
||||
assert(ta2.errors.any?, "Tag alias should be invalid")
|
||||
assert_equal("Tag alias can not create a transitive relation with another tag alias", ta2.errors.full_messages.join)
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
should "move existing aliases" do
|
||||
ta1 = FactoryGirl.create(:tag_alias, :antecedent_name => "aaa", :consequent_name => "bbb", :status => "active")
|
||||
ta2 = FactoryGirl.create(:tag_alias, :antecedent_name => "bbb", :consequent_name => "ccc", :status => "active")
|
||||
ta1.reload
|
||||
assert_equal("ccc", ta1.consequent_name)
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
should "move existing implications" do
|
||||
ti = FactoryGirl.create(:tag_implication, :antecedent_name => "aaa", :consequent_name => "bbb", :status => "active")
|
||||
ta = FactoryGirl.create(:tag_alias, :antecedent_name => "bbb", :consequent_name => "ccc", :status => "active")
|
||||
ti.reload
|
||||
assert_equal("ccc", ti.consequent_name)
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
should "not push the antecedent's category to the consequent if the antecedent is general" do
|
||||
tag1 = FactoryGirl.create(:tag, :name => "aaa")
|
||||
tag2 = FactoryGirl.create(:tag, :name => "bbb", :category => 1)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ class TagImplicationTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
should "ignore pending implications when building descendant names" do
|
||||
ti2 = FactoryGirl.build(:tag_implication, :antecedent_name => "b", :consequent_name => "c")
|
||||
ti2 = FactoryGirl.build(:tag_implication, :antecedent_name => "b", :consequent_name => "c", :status => "pending")
|
||||
ti2.save
|
||||
ti1 = FactoryGirl.create(:tag_implication, :antecedent_name => "a", :consequent_name => "b")
|
||||
assert_equal("b", ti1.descendant_names)
|
||||
@@ -44,6 +44,14 @@ class TagImplicationTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase
|
||||
assert_equal("Antecedent name has already been taken", ti2.errors.full_messages.join(""))
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
should "not validate if its consequent is aliased to another tag" do
|
||||
ta = FactoryGirl.create(:tag_alias, :antecedent_name => "bbb", :consequent_name => "ccc")
|
||||
ti = FactoryGirl.build(:tag_implication, :antecedent_name => "aaa", :consequent_name => "bbb")
|
||||
ti.save
|
||||
assert(ti.errors.any?, "Tag implication should not have validated.")
|
||||
assert_equal("Consequent tag must not be aliased to another tag", ti.errors.full_messages.join(""))
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
should "calculate all its descendants" do
|
||||
ti1 = FactoryGirl.create(:tag_implication, :antecedent_name => "bbb", :consequent_name => "ccc")
|
||||
assert_equal("ccc", ti1.descendant_names)
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user