Fix various elements to use standard font sizes instead of ad-hoc sizes.
Noticeable changes:
* Tags in autocomplete are slightly smaller.
* The favorite heart icon on posts is slightly smaller.
* Pool titles on thumbnails in the pool gallery page are slightly bigger.
* The page footer is slightly smaller.
* Timestamps on comments and forum posts are very slightly smaller.
* "Pending"/"approved"/"rejected" labels on forum posts are very slightly smaller.
Show the length of videos and animated posts in the thumbnail. The
length is shown the top left corner in MM:SS format. This replaces the
play button icon.
Show a speaker icon instead of a music note icon for posts with sound.
Doing this requires doing `.includes(:media_asset)` in a bunch of
places to avoid N+1 queries when we access the post's duration.
Restructure the Dockerfile and the CSS/JS files so that we only rebuild
the CSS and JS when they change, not on every commit.
Before it took several minutes to rebuild the Docker image after every
commit, even when the JS/CSS files didn't change. This also made pulling
images slower.
This requires refactoring the CSS and JS to not use embedded Ruby (ERB)
templates, since this made the CSS and JS dependent on the Ruby
codebase, which is why we had to rebuild the assets after every Ruby
change.
Rotate the image based on the EXIF orientation flag when generating
thumbnails and samples.
Also fix the width and height to be calculated correctly for rotated
images. Vips gives us the unrotated width and height of the image; we
have to detect whether the image is rotated and swap the width and
height manually to correct them. For example, if an image with the
"Rotate 90 CW" flag is 100x500 before rotation, then after rotation it's
500x100. This should fix#4883 (Exif rotation breaks Javascript fit-to-window)
We also have to fix it so that regenerating a post updates the width and
height of the post, in the event that it's a rotated image.
Finally we set `image-orientation: from-image;` even though it's
probably not necessary.
Move the BUR help text from the <textarea> placeholder attribute to a
<details> tag that embeds the [[help:bur_notice]] wiki page.
Also update some CSS for the <details> tag that was meant to only apply
to the user upgrades page and didn't look good here.
Only use hover to hide the checkboxes on devices that support hovering
(i.e. computers with a mouse). On some mobile devices, a tap is used to
emulate hovering, which meant the tag had to be tapped twice.
* Use -webkit-text-stroke instead of bold to indicate selected tags.
Bold causes the tag to change width, which is jarring and can cause
the tag to wrap around to a new line. -webkit-text-stroke doesn't
change the tag's width. Despite the name, this property is widely
supported.
* Don't wrap the checkbox in a label. In combination with flexbox, this
made the hitbox for the tag too big. You could click on empty space
outside the tag and it would still toggle the tag.
Instead of changing the background color of the entire page when you
change modes in the post mode menu (which was ugly, and not obvious what
the colors meant), show a notice and make it so that hovering a post
gives it a blue outline. This indicates that clicking the post will do
something different.
Fix issues with note sizing caused by the switch to `box-sizing: border-box`
in 19aea560. Note boxes have a 1px black border, which is counted as
part of the note box width when using border-box. This threw off sizing
and position calculations.
Also go back to 1px borders instead of 2px borders for unsaved and
selected notes. This also messed up note sizing.
* Standardize dialog box and tooltip box shadows.
* Add shadows behind all other floating elements, namely the
autocomplete menu and translation notes (except for embedded notes,
which are usually meant to be seamless).
Partial revert of b9ea9d2f5. Go back to using a semi-transparent
background to indicate the selected parent/child post, but add more
padding and adjust the transparency to make it more legible.
In the related tags list, use checkboxes and bold to indicate selected
tags, instead of highlighting selected tags with a blue background.
This is so that you can see the colors of selected tags in the related
tags list, and in particular so you can see the artist tag.
Change the new, approved, pending, and rejected labels in the forum to
use an outlined pill style (like user levels in user tooltips) instead
of a filled background style. This is less obtrusive and more readable
in dark mode.
* On the post show page, in the parent/child box, change it so that
currently selected post is more visible. Use a light blue outline
around the current post instead of a dark semi-transparent border.
* Fix it so that there's less empty space around thumbnails in the
parent/child box.
Add a new color palette and rework all site colors (both light mode and dark mode) to
use the new palette.
This ensures that colors are used consistently, from a carefully designed color palette,
instead of being chosen at random.
Before, colors in light mode were chosen on an ad-hoc basis, which resulted in a lot of
random colors and inconsistent design.
The new palette has 7 hues: red, orange, yellow, green, blue, azure (a lighter blue), and
purple. There's also a greyscale. Each hue has 10 shades of brightness, which (including
grey) gives us 80 total colors.
Colors are named like this:
var(--red-0); /* very light red */
var(--red-2); /* light red */
var(--red-5); /* medium red */
var(--red-7); /* dark red */
var(--red-9); /* very dark red */
var(--green-7); /* dark green */
var(--blue-5); /* medium blue */
var(--purple-3); /* light purple */
/* etc */
The color palette is designed to meet the following criteria:
* To have close equivalents to the main colors used in the old color scheme,
especially tag colors, so that changes to major colors are minimized.
* To produce a set of colors that can be used as as main text colors, as background
colors, and as accent colors, both in light mode and dark mode.
* To ensure that colors at the same brightness level have the same perceived brightness.
Green-4, blue-4, red-4, purple-4, etc should all have the same brightness and contrast
ratios. This way colors look balanced. This is actually a difficult problem, because human
color perception is non-linear, so you can't just scale brightness values linearly.
There's a color palette test page at https://danbooru.donmai/static/colors
Notable changes to colors in light mode:
* Username colors are the same as tag colors.
* Copyright tags are a deeper purple.
* Builders are a deeper purple (fixes#4626).
* Moderators are green.
* Gold users are orange.
* Parent borders are a darker green.
* Child borders are a darker orange.
* Unsaved notes have a thicker red border.
* Selected notes have a thicker blue (not green) border.
* Refactor the paginator into a ViewComponent.
* Fix inconsistent spacing between paginator items.
* Fix a bug where the sequential paginator generated the wrong next /
previous page links in the <link rel="{next|prev}"> tags in the <head>.
* Always include the final page as a hidden html element, so that it can
be unhidden with custom CSS.
* Make it easier to change the pagination window.
This makes it so that an element's width includes borders and padding,
so that borders or padding don't cause an element to exceed its
specified width. This is a standard part of most CSS resets.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/box-sizing
Adjust input boxes to fit the screen better on mobile, and to use
consistent sizes throughout the site (no ad-hoc overrides to make
certain input boxes a bit bigger in random places).
On desktop, this makes most input boxes a bit taller and narrower. On
mobile, it makes input boxes the full width of the screen.
This most notably affects the tag edit box, the comment and forum
post box, the wiki page edit box, and the commentary box.
Refactor CSS to use standard Tailwind-style utility classes instead of
ad-hoc rules. This eliminates a lot of single-purpose rules for specific
UI elements and standardizes margins to be more consistent throughout
the site.
Utility classes are defined manually on an as-needed basis instead of
importing Tailwind as a whole. Naming conventions mostly follow
Tailwind's conventions, otherwise they follow Bootstrap.
* https://tailwindcss.com/docs/
* https://getbootstrap.com/docs/5.0/utilities/spacing/
* Factor out the post navbar into a component. The post navbar is the
part of the post containing the current search, the list of pools, and
the list of favgroups, along with next/prev navigation links.
* Change navbar markup: remove various unused CSS classes/IDs, change
pools to use same markup as favgroups, replace nested <div>'s with
flat <ul>/<li> list.
* Use CSS to truncate long searches/pool names/favgroup names if they're
too wide for the screen (especially on mobile).
Factor out FontAwesome icons into a set of helpers. This is so that it's
easier to keep track of which icons we're using and easier to change
icons globally.
Previously thresholded comments were hidden completely. You had to click
the "Show X hidden comments" button to unhide all hidden comments in a
thread. Now it works like this:
* When a comment is below your threshold, the comment text is hidden and
replaced by a `[hidden]` link, which you can click to unhide the comment.
* When a comment is at half your threshold (for example, your threshold
is -8 but the comment is at -4), then the comment is greyed out.
This means that comments aren't completely hidden, they're just
collapsed, so you can see the commenter and the score without unhiding
the comment. It also means you don't have to scroll back up to unhide a
comment, and threads aren't disrupted by comments being secretly
hidden (which is confusing when people are replying to hidden comments,
which forces you to go back up and unhide to find).
Refactor the post preview html to use the ViewComponent framework. This
lets us encapsulate all the HTML, CSS, and helper methods for a UI
component in a single place.
See https://viewcomponent.org.
Add a Restricted user level. Restricted users are level 10, below
Members. New users start out as Restricted if they sign up from a proxy
or an IP recently used by another user.
Restricted users can't update or edit any public content on the site
until they verify their email address, at which point they're promoted
to Member. Restricted users are only allowed to do personal actions
like keep favorites, keep favgroups and saved searches, mark dmails as
read or deleted, or mark forum posts as read.
The restricted state already existed before, the only change here is
that now it's an actual user level instead of a hidden state. Before it
was based on two hidden flags on the user, the `requires_verification`
flag (set when a user signs up from a proxy, etc), and the `is_verified`
flag (set after the user verifies their email). Making it a user level
means that now the Restricted status will be shown publicly.
Introducing a new level below Member means that we have to change every
`is_member?` check to `!is_anonymous` for every place where we used
`is_member?` to check that the current user is logged in.
* Add a frequently asked questions section.
* Add nicer looking upgrade buttons.
* Format the page nicer.
* Prevent users from attempting invalid upgrades on users that are
already Platinum or above.
* Let Mods and Admins see the email addresses of users below their level.
* Let users see their own email address on their profile.
* Let users verify or edit their email address from their profile.
This is to make catching sockpuppets easier, and to make it easier for
users to fix their email.
Add a new Owner user level for the site owner. Highly sensitive
operations like manually changing the passwords of other users will be
restricted to the site owner.
* Only show the current pending flag on flagged posts. Don't show old flags.
* Don't show both the "This post was flagged for review" and the "This
post was flagged and is pending" notices.
* Only show the current pending appeal in the "This post was appealed"
notice. Don't show old appeals.
* Don't show both the "This post was deleted" and the "This post was
appealed" notice on appealed posts. Only show the "This post was
appealed" notice.
* Show "no reason" if no appeal reason was given.
Replace references to the `is_resolved` field with the `status` field.
Post flags were marked as resolved when a post was approved (but not
when the post was deleted because it went unapproved). The status field
supercedes the resolved field.
