tag implications: convert descendant_names to array (#3987).
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
|
||||
class TagImplication < TagRelationship
|
||||
extend Memoist
|
||||
|
||||
array_attribute :descendant_names
|
||||
|
||||
before_save :update_descendant_names
|
||||
after_save :update_descendant_names_for_parents
|
||||
after_destroy :update_descendant_names_for_parents
|
||||
@@ -22,7 +24,7 @@ class TagImplication < TagRelationship
|
||||
module ClassMethods
|
||||
# assumes names are normalized
|
||||
def with_descendants(names)
|
||||
(names + active.where(antecedent_name: names).flat_map(&:descendant_names_array)).uniq
|
||||
(names + active.where(antecedent_name: names).flat_map(&:descendant_names)).uniq
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
def automatic_tags_for(names)
|
||||
@@ -44,12 +46,8 @@ class TagImplication < TagRelationship
|
||||
end
|
||||
memoize :descendants
|
||||
|
||||
def descendant_names_array
|
||||
descendant_names.split(/ /)
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
def update_descendant_names
|
||||
self.descendant_names = descendants.join(" ")
|
||||
self.descendant_names = descendants
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
def update_descendant_names!
|
||||
@@ -88,7 +86,7 @@ class TagImplication < TagRelationship
|
||||
def absence_of_transitive_relation
|
||||
# Find everything else the antecedent implies, not including the current implication.
|
||||
implications = TagImplication.active.where("antecedent_name = ? and consequent_name != ?", antecedent_name, consequent_name)
|
||||
implied_tags = implications.flat_map(&:descendant_names_array)
|
||||
implied_tags = implications.flat_map(&:descendant_names)
|
||||
if implied_tags.include?(consequent_name)
|
||||
self.errors[:base] << "#{antecedent_name} already implies #{consequent_name} through another implication"
|
||||
end
|
||||
@@ -170,7 +168,7 @@ class TagImplication < TagRelationship
|
||||
def update_posts
|
||||
Post.without_timeout do
|
||||
Post.raw_tag_match(antecedent_name).where("true /* TagImplication#update_posts */").find_each do |post|
|
||||
fixed_tags = "#{post.tag_string} #{descendant_names}".strip
|
||||
fixed_tags = "#{post.tag_string} #{descendant_names_string}".strip
|
||||
CurrentUser.scoped(creator, creator_ip_addr) do
|
||||
post.update_attributes(
|
||||
:tag_string => fixed_tags
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
|
||||
class ChangeDescendantNamesToArrayOnTagImplications < ActiveRecord::Migration[5.2]
|
||||
def up
|
||||
TagImplication.without_timeout do
|
||||
change_column :tag_implications, :descendant_names, "text[]", using: "string_to_array(descendant_names, ' ')::text[]", default: "{}"
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
def down
|
||||
TagImplication.without_timeout do
|
||||
change_column :tag_implications, :descendant_names, "text", using: "array_to_string(descendant_names, ' ')", default: nil
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
@@ -3012,7 +3012,7 @@ CREATE TABLE public.tag_implications (
|
||||
id integer NOT NULL,
|
||||
antecedent_name character varying NOT NULL,
|
||||
consequent_name character varying NOT NULL,
|
||||
descendant_names text NOT NULL,
|
||||
descendant_names text[] DEFAULT '{}'::text[] NOT NULL,
|
||||
creator_id integer NOT NULL,
|
||||
creator_ip_addr inet NOT NULL,
|
||||
forum_topic_id integer,
|
||||
@@ -7572,6 +7572,7 @@ INSERT INTO "schema_migrations" (version) VALUES
|
||||
('20180916002448'),
|
||||
('20181108162204'),
|
||||
('20181108205842'),
|
||||
('20181113174914');
|
||||
('20181113174914'),
|
||||
('20181114180205');
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ class TagImplicationTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase
|
||||
ti2 = FactoryBot.build(:tag_implication, :antecedent_name => "b", :consequent_name => "c", :status => "pending")
|
||||
ti2.save
|
||||
ti1 = FactoryBot.create(:tag_implication, :antecedent_name => "a", :consequent_name => "b")
|
||||
assert_equal("b", ti1.descendant_names)
|
||||
assert_equal(%w[b], ti1.descendant_names)
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
should "populate the creator information" do
|
||||
@@ -89,14 +89,11 @@ class TagImplicationTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase
|
||||
|
||||
should "calculate all its descendants" do
|
||||
ti1 = FactoryBot.create(:tag_implication, :antecedent_name => "bbb", :consequent_name => "ccc")
|
||||
assert_equal("ccc", ti1.descendant_names)
|
||||
assert_equal(["ccc"], ti1.descendant_names_array)
|
||||
assert_equal(%w[ccc], ti1.descendant_names)
|
||||
ti2 = FactoryBot.create(:tag_implication, :antecedent_name => "aaa", :consequent_name => "bbb")
|
||||
assert_equal("bbb ccc", ti2.descendant_names)
|
||||
assert_equal(["bbb", "ccc"], ti2.descendant_names_array)
|
||||
assert_equal(%w[bbb ccc], ti2.descendant_names)
|
||||
ti1.reload
|
||||
assert_equal("ccc", ti1.descendant_names)
|
||||
assert_equal(["ccc"], ti1.descendant_names_array)
|
||||
assert_equal(%w[ccc], ti1.descendant_names)
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
should "update its descendants on save" do
|
||||
@@ -109,8 +106,8 @@ class TagImplicationTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase
|
||||
)
|
||||
ti1.reload
|
||||
ti2.reload
|
||||
assert_equal("bbb ddd", ti1.descendant_names)
|
||||
assert_equal("ddd", ti2.descendant_names)
|
||||
assert_equal(%w[bbb ddd], ti1.descendant_names)
|
||||
assert_equal(%w[ddd], ti2.descendant_names)
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
should "update the descendants for all of its parents on destroy" do
|
||||
@@ -122,49 +119,49 @@ class TagImplicationTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase
|
||||
ti2.reload
|
||||
ti3.reload
|
||||
ti4.reload
|
||||
assert_equal("bbb ccc ddd", ti1.descendant_names)
|
||||
assert_equal("bbb ccc ddd", ti2.descendant_names)
|
||||
assert_equal("ccc ddd", ti3.descendant_names)
|
||||
assert_equal("ddd", ti4.descendant_names)
|
||||
assert_equal(%w[bbb ccc ddd], ti1.descendant_names)
|
||||
assert_equal(%w[bbb ccc ddd], ti2.descendant_names)
|
||||
assert_equal(%w[ccc ddd], ti3.descendant_names)
|
||||
assert_equal(%w[ddd], ti4.descendant_names)
|
||||
ti3.destroy
|
||||
ti1.reload
|
||||
ti2.reload
|
||||
ti4.reload
|
||||
assert_equal("bbb", ti1.descendant_names)
|
||||
assert_equal("bbb", ti2.descendant_names)
|
||||
assert_equal("ddd", ti4.descendant_names)
|
||||
assert_equal(%w[bbb], ti1.descendant_names)
|
||||
assert_equal(%w[bbb], ti2.descendant_names)
|
||||
assert_equal(%w[ddd], ti4.descendant_names)
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
should "update the descendants for all of its parents on create" do
|
||||
ti1 = FactoryBot.create(:tag_implication, :antecedent_name => "aaa", :consequent_name => "bbb")
|
||||
ti1.reload
|
||||
assert_equal("active", ti1.status)
|
||||
assert_equal("bbb", ti1.descendant_names)
|
||||
assert_equal(%w[bbb], ti1.descendant_names)
|
||||
|
||||
ti2 = FactoryBot.create(:tag_implication, :antecedent_name => "bbb", :consequent_name => "ccc")
|
||||
ti1.reload
|
||||
ti2.reload
|
||||
assert_equal("active", ti1.status)
|
||||
assert_equal("active", ti2.status)
|
||||
assert_equal("bbb ccc", ti1.descendant_names)
|
||||
assert_equal("ccc", ti2.descendant_names)
|
||||
assert_equal(%w[bbb ccc], ti1.descendant_names)
|
||||
assert_equal(%w[ccc], ti2.descendant_names)
|
||||
|
||||
ti3 = FactoryBot.create(:tag_implication, :antecedent_name => "ccc", :consequent_name => "ddd")
|
||||
ti1.reload
|
||||
ti2.reload
|
||||
ti3.reload
|
||||
assert_equal("bbb ccc ddd", ti1.descendant_names)
|
||||
assert_equal("ccc ddd", ti2.descendant_names)
|
||||
assert_equal(%w[bbb ccc ddd], ti1.descendant_names)
|
||||
assert_equal(%w[ccc ddd], ti2.descendant_names)
|
||||
|
||||
ti4 = FactoryBot.create(:tag_implication, :antecedent_name => "ccc", :consequent_name => "eee")
|
||||
ti1.reload
|
||||
ti2.reload
|
||||
ti3.reload
|
||||
ti4.reload
|
||||
assert_equal("bbb ccc ddd eee", ti1.descendant_names)
|
||||
assert_equal("ccc ddd eee", ti2.descendant_names)
|
||||
assert_equal("ddd", ti3.descendant_names)
|
||||
assert_equal("eee", ti4.descendant_names)
|
||||
assert_equal(%w[bbb ccc ddd eee], ti1.descendant_names)
|
||||
assert_equal(%w[ccc ddd eee], ti2.descendant_names)
|
||||
assert_equal(%w[ddd], ti3.descendant_names)
|
||||
assert_equal(%w[eee], ti4.descendant_names)
|
||||
|
||||
ti5 = FactoryBot.create(:tag_implication, :antecedent_name => "xxx", :consequent_name => "bbb")
|
||||
ti1.reload
|
||||
@@ -172,11 +169,11 @@ class TagImplicationTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase
|
||||
ti3.reload
|
||||
ti4.reload
|
||||
ti5.reload
|
||||
assert_equal("bbb ccc ddd eee", ti1.descendant_names)
|
||||
assert_equal("ccc ddd eee", ti2.descendant_names)
|
||||
assert_equal("ddd", ti3.descendant_names)
|
||||
assert_equal("eee", ti4.descendant_names)
|
||||
assert_equal("bbb ccc ddd eee", ti5.descendant_names)
|
||||
assert_equal(%w[bbb ccc ddd eee], ti1.descendant_names)
|
||||
assert_equal(%w[ccc ddd eee], ti2.descendant_names)
|
||||
assert_equal(%w[ddd], ti3.descendant_names)
|
||||
assert_equal(%w[eee], ti4.descendant_names)
|
||||
assert_equal(%w[bbb ccc ddd eee], ti5.descendant_names)
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
should "update any affected post upon save" do
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user